The 2004 General Assembly Session:
Preparing to
Participate in the Debate on Virginia’s Tax Structure and Budget
Richmond WOMAN, Vol.
1,
Issue 4, February 2004, pp. 12-13
|
The Virginia
General Assembly that convenes the second
Wednesday in January will be meeting at a critical juncture in
Virginia’s
history. In part because of the
balanced budget mandate included in the Virginia constitution and also
because
of a long history of fiscal discipline, Virginia has enjoyed an
enviable
financial reputation among the states and has remained one of a very
few states
with a AAA bond rating. It is now
clear, however, that Virginia has a long term and structural problem
with the
state budget –- Virginia’s revenues and expenditures aren’t equal and
won’t be
unless changes are made. The state is
spending
more annually than it brings in, and several years of budget sleight of
hand
have exhausted the quick fixes available to address this imbalance
(like
withdrawals from the state’s Rainy Day fund).
By the time this
commentary is published, the Governor will
have proposed his 2004-06 budget (on December 17th) that
will
articulate the spending cuts and revenue enhancements he thinks are
necessary
to address this long term problem. The
Governor’s proposed budget will include elements of the “Budget and Tax
Reform
Plan” (unveiled in November) (“the Plan”) that the Governor described
as a plan
to create “tax fairness,” keep “our commitment to education” and
preserve
Virginia’s “fiscal integrity.”
The Governor says
that the Plan will produce greater revenues
while lowering taxes for 65% of Virginia families.
Some key elements of the Plan are:Increased
personal and dependent exemptions and standard
deductions from state income tax for all taxpayers;
- A
lower income tax rate for taxable incomes between $5,000
and $7,000, and between $17,000 and $20,000, and an increased income
tax rate
for taxable incomes over $100,000;
- A
reduction in allowable age based deductions for higher
income taxpayers who turn 65 after January 1, 2005;
- Reductions
in the sales tax on food;
- An
increase of 1% in the sales tax on other goods;
- An increase in the
cigarette tax with proceeds dedicated to
health care;
- Elimination
of the estate tax for family farms and
family-owned businesses;
- Complete
elimination of the car tax by 2008;
- Closure
of some corporate tax loopholes; and
- An
increase in the amount businesses may deduct each year
for equipment or similar purchases from $25,000 to the new federal
limit of
$100,000.
The Governor
proposes to use new revenues created by the
Plan for the following purposes:“Properly fund”
the Standards of Quality that establish the
minimum level of educational quality for public school systems around
the state
(underfunding for the next biennium is estimated to exceed a half
billion
dollars);
- Begin to address
“chronic underfunding” of higher education
(estimated at $140,000,000);
- Keep the
commitment to fund the state’s transportation
needs;
- Restore monies
spent from the Rainy Day fund(at least
$100,000,00 is needed to preserve the state’s AAA bond rating); and
- Reduce pressure on
local governments to raise property
taxes.
But, even with the
changes the Governor proposed in the
Plan, spending cuts will likely be necessary to balance the budget for
the next
biennium. Moreover, the Governor’s
budget incorporating the Plan is only the first step in the budget
process. There is an old saying around
the State Capitol: “the Governor
proposes and the General Assembly disposes.” It
is clear that the legislature will have a lot to say
about the
Governor’s Budget and Tax Reform Plan and which, if any, elements
finally are
incorporated in the budget for the next biennium (beginning July 1,
2004).
Richmond women
will want to keep a close eye on this process
as it unfolds between December 17th when the Governor
presented his
budget and the end of the legislative session the second week in March. Start now by reviewing the Governor’s Budget
and Tax Reform Plan posted on his official website, http://www.governor.virginia.gov,
and figuring out what impact it would have on your family and/or your
business. Then, get ready to consider
carefully the full range of proposals offered to produce a balanced
budget for
the next biennium.
How will the
legislature propose to close the $1.2 billion
projected gap in the budget? Can it do so solely by reducing state
spending?
What spending cuts will be necessary to meet the additional costs of
Medicaid
estimated at $800 million for federally mandated basic health care
needs? Can the state fully fund the
Standards of
Quality (requires an additional $500 million) or help raise teachers’
salaries
to the national average without any new revenues being added to the
budget? Where will we get the money to
pay for the 4% increase in the number of persons sent to state prison? These are the kinds of questions that will
need to be answered before the General Assembly adjourns in March and
on which
we should be prepared to voice our views before the committees and to
the
individuals who will be responsible for this process.
The Senate Finance
Committee will have responsibility for
both the budget and tax issues in the Virginia Senate.
The House Appropriations Committee will
manage the budget issues in the House of Delegates and the House
Finance
Committee will be responsible for tax issues in the House.
Key figures in
this process (in addition to the Governor)
are the chair of the Senate Finance Committee, John H. Chichester (R
Fredericksburg), the Speaker of the House of Delegates, William J.
Howell (R
Stafford County), the Chair of the Appropriations Committee in the
House of
Delegates, Vincent F. Callahan, Jr (R Fairfax), and the Chair of the
House
Finance Committee, Harry Parrish (R Prince William).
Richmond area legislators who are
positioned to play
important
roles in the debate include: Senators Walter Stosch (R Henrico) and
Benjamin
Lambert (D Richmond) who serve on the Senate Finance Committee;
Delegates Kirk
Cox (R Colonial Heights), Frank Hall (D Richmond), Riley Ingram (R
Hopewell),
Jack Reid (R Henrico) who serve on the House Appropriations Committee;
and
Delegates Sam Nixon (R Chesterfield), John O’Bannon (R Henrico) and Lee
Ware (R
Powhatan) who serve on the House Finance Committee.
User friendly
links to legislative bill tracking, executive
branch and legislative contact information and press releases dealing
with
state government affairs can be found on the Public Policy page of the
website
of the Richmond chapter of the National Association of Women Business
Owners, www.nawborichmond.org.
The activities
of the House Appropriations Committee may be monitored online at the
Committee’s website, http://hac.state.va.us/welcome.htm.
The Senate Finance Committee also maintains a website that can be found
at http://leg3.state.va.us/quickplace/sfc2004/main.nsf/h_Toc/4c12e5b390d5472285256de5006c79ec/?OpenDocument.
The critical
importance of the budget and tax reform debate
that will take place in the 2004 General Assembly makes it especially
necessary
that we understand the unique opportunity our central location offers
Richmond
women to influence this debate. We must
step forward to meet this obligation fully so that the voices of the
majority
of Virginia’s population – women – are heard distinctly and clearly
throughout
the process. We cannot afford to be silent or unengaged while critical
state
programs that help ensure safe homes and streets, quality schools and
access to
health care are examined for cuts. We
cannot afford to be absent when policy decisions are made that will
affect the
financial health of our families and businesses for years to come.
|